George Orwell Essay

A comparison between Dickens hard times & Or heads 1984 I am writing intimately two originals that seem to come across as very different. Orwells novel drawing a nightmarish image of his opinionated future of Britain. Where as Dickens novel creates a vision to represent Victorian education over 150 years ago. Both of these storylines dehumanize and dictate a society, both of very different kinds. Charles Dickens and George Orwells novels differ in the amusement of the society and in the plot of the actual storyline.The innocence of the children and the bleak severity of the head teacher is what daemon focuses on to display his thoughts of Victorian schools. In which Orwell depicts a society where everything is bleak and distraught and dictated by a soulless party, BIG blood brother. Further more both novels were written at all in all different generations, Dickens being the Victorian times and Orwells being the mid nineteen hundreds. disrespect all these cuts that divide the novels apart they seem to come across as very similar.Within hand-to-hand inspection of the novels they seem to both control and authorise their societies. Orwell has used an empowering feature as his leader he has created a party lead by BIG blood brother. Where as in Dickens set about to create a leader he has used a less excessive and extreme character called Mr Gradgrind, the head teacher who only(prenominal) implicates facts. Although he may not be as demanding as Orwells approach, he uses satire to dissolve the pupils mentality. Both of these characters apply a very tyrannic attitude towards there audience and offer them no thought and identity.Girl number 20 6079 metalworker Both authors have produced an zephyr where people who are commanded by them, are clarified as empty objects rather than individuals with an imagination. This strips them down to nothing but factorised minds in one case, and an imagination that hardly existed in Orwells novel. In an extract from Ha rd times, the author disembowels the imagination of the students and use the idea of Morgiana & the 40 thieves. not unlike Morgiana looking into all the vessels ranged before him This gives an idea of Mr Gradgrind pouring the facts from his factorised mind, into the students damaged imagination. This studys with Orwells approach, where BIG BROTHER brutally demolishes the entire imagination and thought, as they suffer in a decayed dystopia. An additional subscriber line linking the novels together is, the stern and domineering party in both societies. The BIG BROTHER party emphasises the issue of them surveying the society of the party members and this is persistently repeated in the novel.In which Mr Gradgrind constantly stresses the importance of facts and crushes the childrens minds, until they grasp the significance of facts. In this life, we want nothing but facts, sir nothing but facts BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING YOU These two quotations illustrate the emphasis and constant rep etition of the parties. The author uses these effects to not only get the picture imprinted in the mind of the characters, but in addition into the readers. Furthermore, the BIG BROTHER party in Orwells novel, links very well with Dickens criticizing character, Mr Gradgrind.These two characters both contrast and appear as very similar in personality and in appearance. They both are displayed with a face that jolts the reader, and creates in their imagination a daunting and depressing figure. The black-moustachioed face gazed down while the dark eyes looked into Winstons own While his eyes found commodious cellarage in two dark caves, over outraged by the wall The first quotation is Orwell showing his opinion of BIG BROTHER gazing with fear, and this compares extremely well with dickens attempt to create the same sort of atmosphere.Dickens expresses more scarce by employ a metaphor to show his view of a leader, he also goes into more detail about the bold figure of Mr Gradgrind. N ot only do they link well in appearance, but also in attitude towards their society. Both seem to dictate, and show immense power on the regulations of their own society. In conclusion, I feel that both authors have created a society and atmosphere that both link together and show many similarities.Although they may well both show differences, they dont even compare with the shear amount of evidence that link the novels together. Each author has created authority, control and power to create an atmosphere that can dictate a whole society. In this case the societies are very alike and the impression of speech used by each author is much the same. In my opinion, these two novels equally portray a society that can create a vision for the reader to see a glance of the past or what may be a glimpse of the future.